Ignatius of Antioch

By: Dwayne Spearman

Introduction

Ignatius’ life began in AD 50. [1] An early ecclesiastical writer suggests that he was one of several children who were held in the arms of our Lord Jesus in the Gospel of Mark when he said to the apostles, “If any man desires to be first, the same shall be last of all, and servant of all. And he took a child, and set him in the midst of them: and when he had taken him in his arms, he said unto them, whosoever shall receive one of such children in my name, receiveth me.” [2] Of course, this is just legend and cannot be proven.

            On the other hand, it is very probable that Ignatius was a very dear friend of the much loved Bishop of Smyrna, Polycarp. [3] Most will agree that both he and Polycarp were discipled at the feet of the Apostle John. [4] Yet, he was also considered to be a devoted disciple of the apostle Paul as well. [5] This can be seen in his use of the Pauline writings in his struggle against heresies and the formation of other doctrines.

However, his associations didn’t stop with Polycarp, John and Paul; according to Eusebius, he was appointed as the third Bishop of Antioch by none other than Peter himself. [6] John Chrysostom confirms this when he said that Ignatius had received “his episcopal consecration at the hands of the Apostles themselves.” [7]

            There are actually fifteen epistles that are attributed to Ignatius. [8] However, eight of them “bear in themselves indubitable proof” that they were written long after Ignatius had already died. [9] That leaves seven of which the evidence points to his own pen. These he wrote while on his way in chains to face martyrdom in Rome around AD 115. [10] He wrote four of the letters from Smyrna to the churches at Ephesus, Magnesia, and Tralles in Asia and to the church at Rome. He also wrote three more from Troas to the churches of Philadelphia, Smyrna, and to the Bishop of Smyrna: Polycarp.

The thesis of this paper will be to examine the life, work and contribution of Ignatius of Antioch to the early church in his response to the infiltration of heresy, the formation of doctrine, and the role of the church.

The Bishop of Antioch

In order to know Ignatius, it is important to know the background of the church which he served as bishop. It was said by Josephus that after Rome and Alexandria, Antioch deserved the “place of the third city in the habitable earth under the Roman Empire in magnitude and prosperity. [11] It was founded in BC 300 as the capital of Syria with over a half million residents and was considered to be a very affluent and cosmopolitan city. [12]

There are several things that we can learn from the Scriptures about the importance of Antioch in the early church. First, it was at Antioch that the followers of Christ were first called Christians (Acts 11:26). Second, it was also from Antioch that the first missionaries were sent out in Paul and Barnabas when it says that there was a gathering and “as they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy Ghost said, separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them. And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away.” [13] Third, it was the occasion for the calling of the first council in Jerusalem shortly after Paul and Barnabas had preached at Antioch in Pisidia (Acts 15). Fourth, it was also the place in which Paul withstood Peter for his hypocrisy (Acts 2:11) and was the most likely place from which Matthew wrote his Gospel. It was to this church that Ignatius came to serve some sixty years later. [14]

Infiltration of Legalism

In the seven letters that we know to be original to his pen, Ignatius addressed what he saw as threats to the church of his day and specifically to his church in Antioch. These threats came from two fronts: legalism and Gnosticism. The first to be discussed is that of legalism.

The legalism that he faced in Antioch was a Jewish expression of the faith in that its roots went all the way back to the very beginnings of Christianity. [15] Historically, Antioch had a very large Jewish population that had existed long before Christianity made its way there. However, with the rise of Christianity, they had learned to co-exist and many of them had converted over to Christianity and were a part of the church of Antioch.

Unfortunately, these Jews felt very strongly that certain requirements of the law were to be adhered to even in the Christian church. Ignatius referred to this as Judaizing. [16] His warning was that it was absurd to profess Christ and to insist upon any requirements of the law to be kept. He reminded his flock that Christianity was not the one that had embraced Judaism, but it was Judaism that had embraced Christianity. [17]

Of course, the seeds of legalism where planted many years earlier when Paul addressed it in his epistles. To the Galatians he had sent a similar warning when he told them that he marveled that they had so soon turned from the grace that had come through Jesus Christ to another gospel that really wasn’t another gospel at all, but a perversion of the true gospel that they had received. [18] He even went on to say that if anyone, even an angel from heaven were to come and tell them anything different, that he was to be accursed. [19] Needless to say, it’s obvious that Paul took legalism head-on.

In like manner, Ignatius did the same when he said, “let us learn to live according to the principles of Christianity. For whosoever is called by any other name besides this is not of God. Lay aside, therefore, the evil, the old, the sour leaven, and be changed into the new leaven, which is Jesus Christ.” [20] To Ignatius, to Judaize meant to place oneself under the law while rejecting the fact that it “points inevitably to Jesus Christ as the center of human history.” [21]

            He went on to say that for one to keep the law as a basis of salvation was to reject the very essence of Christianity. [22] This was basically a paraphrase of what Paul had said in Galatians 5:2-4 when he said, “Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.”

            He goes on to say in his letter to the Philadelphians, “but if any one preach the Jewish law unto you, listen not to him. For it is better to hearken to Christian doctrine from a man who has been circumcised, than to Judaism from one uncircumcised.” [23] He compared those who followed the men who brought this false doctrine into their midst as having falling “upon the hooks of vain doctrine”, and as such, they were not able to have the full assurance of what happened in regard to the birth, passion, and resurrection. [24]

Infiltration of Gnosticism

The next threat that was faced by the early church that Ignatius felt compelled to address was Gnosticism. They called themselves the Gnostikoi or Gnostics which means “those capable of attaining knowledge” or the “knowing ones.” However, the very term itself is a contradiction, because in the Greek, the word speaks of an immediate experiential knowledge while they saw knowledge as only a quasi-intuitive knowledge. [25]

The main difference was between Gnosticism and Judaism and Christianity is that the latter holds that the soul “attains its proper end by obedience to the mind and the will of a Supreme Power (i.e, faith and works), while the former sees salvation of the soul to be found in knowledge. [26] Thus, they were called the “people who knew”. However, other than that, Gnosticism was pretty broad in that it did not have a coherent uniform set of beliefs, but was instead more of a series of movements. [27]

The aspect of Gnosticism that bothered Ignatius most was its teaching on what was known as “Docetism.” [28] Unlike many things, Docetism was one thing that virtually all Gnostics shared in common. It was the belief that Jesus did not really come in human flesh. Instead, his body only seemed to be physical. The flesh that was seen with the visible eye was actually an apparition.

Ignatius was confronted with Docetism at each Eucharistic service in which its adherents refused to partake on the grounds that it was impossible for it to actually be the flesh of Jesus since he had no flesh. However, the issue of Docetism started long before Ignatius. As a matter of fact, the Apostle John was dealing with the same issue when he wrote, “For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. [29] He also warned them in 1 John 4:2 when he said, “Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God.”

Of the Docetai, Ignatius warned that they should “avoid the deadly errors of the Docetae, flee, therefore, those evil offshoots of Satan, which produce death-bearing fruit, whereof if any one tastes, he instantly dies.” [30] He goes on to say that the men who spread this false doctrine are not of God, for “if they were, they would appear as branches of the cross, and their fruit would be incorruptible.” [31]

Formation of Doctrine

In the process of fighting off the heresies of the day such as legalism and Gnosticism, Ignatius relied upon and even solidified some major doctrines that were in the process of being accepted or were already accepted by the church at large. For the sake of brevity, only a few will be dealt with in the areas of Ecclesiology, Christology, Pneumatology, Eschatology and Soteriology.

The first doctrine that Ignatius clearly embraced was that of the church. As already discussed, he was the first to teach the threefold-fold ministry of leadership in the church. This meant that he believed that the church was to be led by a bishop, working with the presbytery and the deacons. He wrote to the Trallians that they were to “please the deacons,” “be subject to the presbyters,” and to “do nothing without the bishop.” [32]   

The second doctrine was that of the Triune Godhead, or the Trinity. While he never did explicitly use the word, he certainly did believe in it as is suggested by his references to the Son and the Holy Spirit. For example, when referring to the Son when writing to the Magnesians, he said that Jesus Christ was “with the Father before the beginning of time”; clearly speaking of the eternality of Christ. [33] Also, in the same letter he said of Jesus that he “came forth from one Father, and is with and has gone to one.” [34] A modern translation would be that Jesus came forth from the one Father and remained with the One and returned to the One.

Also, in reference to the Holy Spirit, he placed him in a position of equality with God the Father and the Son. [35] When writing to the Ephesians he said that they were as “stones of the temple of the Father, prepared for the building of God the Father, and drawn up on high by the instrument of Jesus Christ, which is the cross, making use of the Holy Spirit as a rope.” [36]

The third doctrine was that of the resurrection. His confidence in a future resurrection was obvious and apparently fueled his lack of fear in the face of most certain martyrdom. [37] This is seen in his encouragement to the Ephesians when he said that God had deemed him “worthy to be sent for from the east unto the west, and to become a martyr in behalf of His own precious sufferings, so as to pass from the world to God, that I may rise again unto Him.” [38]

The forth doctrine was that of salvation. He clearly believed that Jesus was not only the way of salvation for the church, but also everyone who came before. He wrote in his letter to the Philadelphians, “He is the door of the Father, by which enter in Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the prophets, and the apostles, and the Church.” [39] He also wrote “the cross of Christ is indeed a stumbling-block to those that do not believe, but to the believing it is salvation and life eternal.” [40]

The Role of the Church

In regards to the role of the church, Ignatius believed that the best church is one that is organized well. He believed that a “well-led church” is best able to hold on to the truth. [41] He developed his view of the monepiscopacy from the writings of Paul when he told Titus in Titus 1:9-11 to hold “fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers. For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:  Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.” He believed, just as the Apostle Paul, that there was a high value on order and that communities must be administered under authoritative shepherds who could meet the challenges that were facing the church with one voice. [42] He actually viewed the bishop as a picture of “God’s presence within the congregation.” [43]

            That was not to say that he believed that the bishop was the only leader in the church as that he did advocate a plurality of elders. As a matter of fact, he was the first in the early church to advocate the three-fold ministry of leadership in the local church and insisted that it was not even possible to have a church without these three present. [44]

This is seen in his responses to the divisiveness and the heresies that were plaguing the church as he continually urged the people to obey the Christian leaders that God had placed over them. He referred to these leaders as the bishop who presides in the place of God, the presbyters who symbolized the assembly of the apostles, and the deacons, who represented the servant Christ. [45] To this he added, “As therefore the Lord does nothing without the Father, for says He, "I can of mine own self do nothing," so do ye, neither presbyter, nor deacon, nor layman, do anything without the bishop. [46]

            He went on to encourage the Smyrnaeans to honor both God and the bishop because he that honors the bishop has been honored by God himself. [47] He went so far as to tell them that if they did anything without the bishop’s knowledge, they were actually serving the devil and not God.

Ignatius’ Death

History tell us that Ignatius was martyred somewhere between AD 98 and 117 after being arrested under the emperor Trajan. Some believe that it was the resulting backlash of an earthquake in AD 115 that was blamed on the Christians for angering the gods. [48] However, to come up with any other reason than just the mere fact that he bore “the name” is not necessary. That alone was enough to warrant his death.

In one of his surviving letters that he wrote on his way to Rome, he pleaded with fellow Christians to not intervene to save him from his fate. He said, “if ye are silent concerning me, I shall become God's; but if you show your love to my flesh, I shall again have to run my race. Pray, then, do not seek to confer any greater favour upon me than that I be sacrificed to God while the altar is still prepared.” [49] Nevertheless, that did not stop fellows Christians from meeting him along the way and ministering him in his journey. One such comforter was no less than Polycarp, the Bishop of Smyrna himself.  

            It is obvious from his writings to the Romans that Ignatius knew full well what most likely awaited him in Rome. Yet, he said that he was willing “to fall a prey to the wild beasts and become food” for them. [50] He went on to say, “I am the wheat of God, and let me be ground by the teeth of the wild beasts, that I may be found the pure bread of Christ.” [51] His desire was to be what he called an “imitator of the passion” of his God. [52]

            Historically, Hippolytus records that when he arrived in Rome that is exactly what happened. They immediately ushered him to the amphitheater where he was cast to the wild beasts just as he thought he would be. It is said that the animals consumed all of him but the “harder portions” which were later collected and taken to his church in Antioch. [53] Alas, it is certainly true that “a martyr ground up by the fangs of savage beasts like wheat in a flour mill cannot be accused of failing to make truth claims; his death is the ultimate witness to truth.” [54]

John Chrysostom later wrote of Ignatius’ death, “The Devil did not know that Ignatius had Jesus with him, as a fellow traveller, and fellow exile on so long a journey, [and] he [Ignatius] rather became the stronger, and afforded more proof of the power that was with him, and to a greater degree knit the Churches together." [55]

Conclusion

The life of Ignatius of Antioch not only had a lasting impact on the church of his day, but also on the church down through the centuries. He modeled what it meant to love his local church in Antioch in the same way that Christ loved the universal church by serving faithfully as the under-shepherd and was willing to give the ultimate sacrifice for it.

With that sacrificial love, came an unflinching determine to stand up to the heresies that had already begun to creep into the church and were already tearing at the very fiber of its existence. To the legalists, he charged that if they continued to try to keep the law as a means of salvation, they were rejecting the very essence of Christianity. [56] To the Gnostics he reminded them of the Apostle John’s words when he said, “Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God.” [57]

As he used the Scriptures to fend off these heresies, he also aided in the formation of accepted doctrine in the early church. His arguments furthered the solidification of three-fold leadership in the church, the Triune Godhead and the place of the Son and the Holy Spirit, the resurrection of the dead and salvation that only comes through faith in Jesus Christ.

He was also used by God to establish the role of the church. This came mainly through his view of the monepiscopacy that came out of his conviction that leadership comes through a well led church. He advocated that the bishops preside in the place of God, the presbyters symbolize the assembly of the apostles, and the deacons represent the servant Christ. [58] This effort was to ensure that the message of Christ as given through the church was safeguarded by creating a unified stance against competing versions of the faith. [59]

Lastly, his death was the ultimate witness to truth in that he was willing to give his life for what he knew to be true. He not only had something that was worth living for, but also something worth dying for. In reality, he did not die for an idea, or even a set of ideas, but for his faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. [60]

Some areas of further study that were inspired during this project include how the monepiscopacy or bishop led model of church governance served not only the early church, but also the church of the middle ages. Obviously, there was a break down that culminated in the need for the Reformation, but how has moving away from that model helped or hindered the church? Has the resulting rise of literally thousands of denominations helped or has it led down a road of self-destruction? Has the concern that Johann von Staupitz expressed to Martin Luther about the Reformation serving only to destroy the unity of the church come to pass?

Biblography

Boer, Paul A, Sr. Irenaeus. Against Heresies: Excerpted from: Apostolic Fathers, Vol. 1.,

Veritatis Splendor Publications, 2012.

Eusebius: The History of the Church

Hall, Christopher A. Learning Theology with the Church Fathers. Downers Grove,

Il:InterVarsity Press, 2002.

King, Robert Alan. Ignatius of Antioch: His Beliefs on the Trinity, Salvation, Sin, Christianity,

and the Church. Casa Grande, AZ: King & Associates, 2012.

Litfin, Bryan M. Getting to Know the Church Fathers: An Evangelical Introduction. Grand

Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2007.

O’Connor, John Bonaventure. “St. Ignatius of Antioch.” The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 7.

New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/       07644a.html (accessed on November 26, 2012).

Roberts, Alexander and James Donaldson, eds., Anti-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1. Christian

Classics Ethereal Library, Electronic Edition, 1885.

St. Ignatius of Antioch: The Epistles

The Fall of Iraq

Too many in the Middle East simply do not have enough conviction to choose sides. The end result is that while they are trying to pacify both, they are losing. 

The Real Reason Liberal Churches Are Losing Members

I believe that this article had a lot of truth in it. Churches that tend to lean to the left, in my opinion and observation, are dying off much quicker than those who do not. The author made a good point when he asked why would anyone go to a church with a bunch of people who do not really believe the Bible. 


It reminds me of a video by Tim Hawkins about atheist Bible camp songs.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVnFMy7A9mY

Casting Crowns - Does Anybody Hear Her

A video that should make all of us truly think.

The Attributes of God

By: Dwayne Spearman

History of the Doctrine of God

            There is no systematic theology equivalent to what there is today to be found in the Scriptures. [1] Instead, it has developed over a number of years as the church grew and transitioned. In the first century church, there was no need for a systematic theology per se. The church was pretty much contained to Jerusalem where the apostles lived and taught. They were always available to help the people when any kind of doubt or disagreement arose. For example, when the early church had their first dispute about the Hellenists who felt that their widows were being neglected in the distribution each day, the apostles were there to immediately step in to tell them what they needed to do to solve the problem (Acts 6:1:7).

            As time passed, as a result of the first persecution at the hands of Saul in Acts 8, the church began to spread out beyond Jerusalem. False doctrines had already begun to creep into the church and the need for clarification became even more critical. However, when these times occurred, the apostles were still there to help just as they were when the question of what to impose upon the newly converted Gentiles in Acts 15 arose. They merely convened, came to a consensus and still continued to help lead the early church.

            However, when the apostles passed away and the Jews were even further dispersed after Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 A.D., everything changed. The church began to develop theological traditions about God such as Platonism, Gnosticism, Neoplatonism, etc. [2] It was then that counsels began to convene in an attempt to settle disagreements instead of apostles (e.g. the Council of Nicaea in 325, the Council of Constantinople in 381, Chalcedon in 451, etc.) [3] All of these served to establish a systematic theology and the church’s basic understanding of the Doctrine of God.

Application to the Church Today

The application for the Doctrine of God to the church today is huge. For most people, the question is not the mere existence of God, but who that God is. According to statistics, nearly ninety-five percent of Americans say that they believe in God. [4] The problem is that most of them believe in a God that they know very little about. According to Stephen Prothero, “America is composed of Protestants who can’t name the four Gospels, Catholics who can’t name the seven sacraments, and Jews who can’t name the five books of Moses.” [5]

            Froese and Bader suggest that in the church today, God is either viewed as authoritative, benevolent, critical or distant.  The way the church defines that God affects everything in regards to the church collectively and the individual particularly (i.e. moral, political and social values.) ^[6]

Accordingly, those who believe in an Authoritative God believe in a God who is actively engaged in this world and very judgmental. Those who believe in a Benevolent God believe that God is definitely involved, but not judgmental. Those who believe in a Critical God believe in a God who is judgmental but not actively engaged. And then finally, those who believe in a Distant God see God as nonjudgmental and inactive. ^[7]           

More than ever, the church today needs a clear understanding of who the God of the Bible is. Ultimately, without a proper knowledge of that God, there can be no basis for morality, hope or purpose. Without a proper knowledge of that God, there can be no answers to the deep questions of life and the purposes of man.[8]

Introduction to the Attributes of God

An important part of the Doctrine of God is the attributes of God that are seen throughout the Scriptures. In Romans 1:20-22, it says, “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse” (NKJV) [9] According to the Webster’s Dictionary, attributes are “that which is attributed; or considered as belonging to, or inherent in.” [10] It could also be said that they are characteristics of a person or thing. In essence, the attributes of God are the essential characteristics without which God would not be God. [11]

A.W. Tozer once wrote, “Man’s spiritual history will positively demonstrate that no religion has ever been greater than its idea of God. Worship is pure or base as the worshipper entertains high or low thoughts of God.” [12] This paper will argue that God does have natural attributes, what those attribute are, and that those same attributes are found in Jesus Christ and serve as proof of His deity.

Categorization of Attributes

As for categorization, there are many ways of doing this. Let it first be noted that there is much disagreement as to exactly how many attributes there are and how they should be divided. Tozer points out that some have insisted on as few as seven while others have suggested thousands. [13] According to Van den Brink, the only one mentioned explicitly in the Scriptures is the attribute of love. [14] All of the rest must simply be deduced from what the Bible itself says about God. [15] The exact number is debatable because they are so “intimately connected” (e.g. transcendence, immensity, eternity and immutability). [16]

However, it is usually agreed that they can be generally divided up into two groups (e.g. natural and moral, incommunicable and communicable, passive and active, absolute and relative, positive and negative, etc.). Frame says that they should be possibly divided between transcendence (e.g. eternity, infinite, etc.) and immanence (e.g. justice, love, grace, etc.). [17] Still others such as Elwell chose to divide them between metaphysical, intellectual, ethical, emotional, existential and relational. [18] However, for the sake of this paper, they will be referred to as natural and moral. However, the focus of this paper will only be the natural attributes.

Finally, it has also been asserted that there are three methods to determine exactly what the divine attributes should be. Hodge believes that the first method is to attribute to God every “excellence that we have any experience or conception of in an infinite degree” and deny every imperfection and limitation. [19] The second is to infer His characteristics from what we see Him doing around us, and third is to take heed to the “didactic statements of Scripture.” [20]

Natural Attributes of God

                Natural attributes are those attributes of God that are at the very nature of His being and are His and His alone. There is nothing about them found “in a created spirit”. [21] For example, the Bible says in 1 John 3:2, “Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.” It must be noted that when the Bible says, “we shall be like him”, it is not saying that man will have God’s natural attributes, instead, it is saying that man will have His moral attributes. Of course, there are disagreements over what each attribute is called and exactly how many there should be in totality, but most will agree that God’s natural attributes should be: transcendence, immanence, eternality, infinite, immutable, omniscience, omnipresence and omnipotence.

Transcendent

                The first natural attribute is transcendence. The Bible speaks of this in Isaiah 46:8-10, “Remember this, and show yourselves men; Recall to mind, O you transgressors. Remember the former things of old, For I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like Me, Declaring the end from the beginning, And from ancient times things that are not yet done, Saying, 'My counsel shall stand, And I will do all My pleasure.” This attribute speaks of the fact that God is independent of and above His creation. It is also referred to by some as immensity. It takes into consideration that God transcends all spatial limitations and is present “in every point of space with His whole being.” [22] This is what God meant when He told Moses that his name is I Am That I Am(Exodus 3:14).

                This same attribute can be found in Jesus Christ as well. The Bible says that Jesus played an active role in creation; therefore He had to have been with God in the beginning. [23] John 1:3 says that, “All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made”. Also, in John 1:10 it says, “He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him.” The Bible also says that Jesus claimed to be one and the same with God through his infamous seven “I Am” statements, thus declaring Himself to be self-existent. [24] The first of which is in John 8:24 when he said, “Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that I am He, you will die in your sins." Jesus is transcendent.

Immanent

                The second natural attribute is immanence. Although God is above His creation, He is also “wholly present in every part and moment” of His created universe. [25] The Bible says in Psalms 33:13-14 that “The LORD looks from heaven; He sees all the sons of men. From the place of His dwelling He looks on all the inhabitants of the earth.” Of course, the climax of God’s immanence was His coming to earth in the incarnation, living for thirty-three years among us, and dying on a cross for man’s sins. Matthew 8:17 says that “HE HIMSELF TOOK OUR INFIRMITIES AND BORE OUR SICKNESSES." He became one of us! Jesus is immanent.

Eternal

                The third natural attribute is eternity. This means that God has no beginning or ending. In other words, there never was a time when He did not exist. [26] He is eternally present. Psalms 90:2 says, “Before the mountains were born or you brought forth the earth and the world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God.”

This is also true of Jesus. He said in John 8:56-58, “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad." The Jews responded, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?" To which Jesus said, "Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM." Another verse that is very familiar to most that also confirms His eternity is Micah 5:2 which says, “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Though you are little among the thousands of Judah, Yet out of you shall come forth to Me The One to be Ruler in Israel, Whose goings forth are from of old, From everlasting." The Word everlasting actually means eternity and speaks of the “eternality and the pre-existence of the Son of God.” [27] Jesus is eternal.

Infinite

                The fourth natural attribute is infinity. It means that God is free from all limitations and in no way limited by “this time-space world”. [28] The Bible says in Isaiah 55:8-9, “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways," declares the LORD. "As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.” Another way of saying it is that God is measureless (i.e. if He could be measured, He would obviously have limitations).

This attribute is also seen in Jesus Christ in the New Testament when Paul tells the Ephesians that grace has been given to him to “preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ” (Ephesians 3:8) and further says that to comprehend “the width and length and depth and height…of Christ…passes knowledge” (Ephesians 3:18-19). Jesus is infinite.

Immutable

                The fifth natural attribute of God is immutability. To say that God is immutable means that He is unchanging. Malachi 3:16 says, “For I am the LORD, I do not change; Therefore you are not consumed, O sons of Jacob.” Again, in the New Testament, James 1:17 says, “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and comes down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shadow of turning.” In other words, not only does God not change, but He is incapable of change.

Unfortunately, some confuse immutability with impassability which says that God is incapable of emotion. The thought process is that if God has emotions (i.e. love, happiness, sadness, grief, etc.), then He is no longer immutable because these emotions would represent a need for change. However, God must be open to influence in order to “take account of the world” and if He were unable to do that He would not be able to “enter into a relation to that world.” [29] It is a throwback to Plato’s argument that a perfect being does not need feelings and to even say so is the strip them of their perfection, at which point they would cease to be gods. [30] However, Hebrews 4:15 says that “we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.” This attribute is also seen of Jesus Christ in Hebrews 13:8 where it says, “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.” Jesus is immutable.

Omniscience

                The sixth natural attribute of God is omniscience. It means that God is all-knowing. He knows the future as well as the past. His “intellectual capabilities are unlimited” and He “uses them fully and perfectly.” [31] The Psalmist said, “O LORD, You have searched me and known me. You know my sitting down and my rising up; You understand my thought afar off. You comprehend my path and my lying down, and are acquainted with all my ways. For there is not a word on my tongue, but behold, O LORD, You know it altogether” (Psalms 139:1-4).

Everitt said of this that God’s omniscience “must be contained to propositional knowledge in that He knows of every truth that it is true and thus knows of every falsehood that it is false). [32]

Omniscience means that God knows the future as well as the past is indicated in Isaiah 46:10-11 when he said, "I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say: My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please. From the east I summon a bird of prey; from a far-off land, a man to fulfill my purpose. What I have said, that will I bring about; what I have planned, that will I do."

                 Jesus Christ also has this attribute. John 2:24-25 says, “But Jesus did not commit Himself to them, because He knew all men, and had no need that anyone should testify of man, for He knew what was in man.” Also, Peter said of Jesus in John 21:17 in response to His question about his love for Him, "Lord, You know all things; You know that I love You." The Bible even says that Jesus knew that Judas was the one who was to betray him (John 6:64). Jesus is omniscient.

Omnipresence

                The seventh natural attribute of God is omnipresence. That means that God is everywhere present. Thomas Aquinas believed that omnipresence and timelessness had to necessarily go hand-in-hand because in order for God to be everywhere present, He also had to be timeless. [33] The prophet Jeremiah wrote, "Am I only a God nearby," declares the LORD, "and not a God far away? Can anyone hide in secret places so that I cannot see him?" declares the LORD. "Do not I fill heaven and earth?" declares the LORD” (Jeremiah 23:23-24).

            The Psalmist also declared God omnipresence when he wrote, “Where can I go from Your Spirit? Or where can I flee from Your presence? If I ascend into heaven, You are there; If I make my bed in hell, behold, You are there” (Psalms 139:7-9).

            The Bible also declares that Jesus is omnipresent. When speaking of fellowship and the His presence, Jesus said in Matthew 18:20, “For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in the midst of them." That means that no matter where or how many present, Jesus is there. Ephesians 4:10 proves that Jesus is everywhere when it says, “He who descended is also the One who ascended far above all the heavens, that He might fill all things. Jesus is omnipresent.

Omnipotence

The eighth natural attribute of God is omnipotence. It speaks to the fact that God is all-powerful. “God is able to do whatever he wills in the way in which He wills it.” [34] “Ah, Lord GOD! Behold, You have made the heavens and the earth by Your great power and outstretched arm. There is nothing too hard for You (Jeremiah 32:17). Wierenga put it this way, “Omnipotence is to be understood in terms of the ability to bring about states of affairs.” [35]  Jesus made a familiar statement in Matthew 19:26 when He said, “With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."

            From Scripture, we can also deduce that Jesus is omnipotent as well. John Walvoord agrees when he says that the evidence that Christ was omnipotent is decisive and it “sometimes takes the form of physical power, but more often refers to His authority over creation” (i.e. He forgave sins (Matthew 9:6), had power of nature (Luke 8:25), power over His own life (John 10:18), the power to give eternal life (John 17:2), etc.” [36]Jesus is omnipotent.

Conclusion

Using the Scriptures, the attributes of God are evident throughout. He is indeed transcendent, immanent, eternal, infinite, immutable, omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. Not only does He uniquely possess each of these attributes, but He does so in an unlimited quantity. They are essential characteristics without which, He would not be God. [37]

Again, using the Scriptures, these same attributes that uniquely belong to God are also to be found in the Lord Jesus Christ and serve as proof of His deity. He too is transcendent, immanent, eternal, infinite, immutable, omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent.

The church desperately needs to embrace this essential doctrine again. Maybe there needs to be another great council with the goal of returning the church back to a basic understanding of the God in which she confesses to serve. There are far too many conflicting views that are contrary to the clearly revealed facts as found in the Holy Scriptures. The end result is confusion and a loss of direction for the church. Tozer said that in order for the church to regain her lost power, “she must see heaven opened and have a transforming vision of who God really is.” [38] It will be then and only then, that the church will truly understand the words that were uttered so many years ago by the prophet Isaiah, “For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6).

Bibliography

Berkhof, Louis. Systematic Theology. Carlisle, PA: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1958.

Bray, Gerald. The Doctrine of God: Contours of Christian Theology. Downers Grove, IL:

InterVarsity Press, 1993. 

Elwell, Walter A., ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Second Edition. Grand

Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2001.

Erickson, Millard. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker House Books, 1998.

Erickson, Millard. Readings in Christian Theology: The Living God, Volume. 1, The Living God.

Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1973.

Everitt, Nicholas. “The Divine Attributes.” Philosophy Compass, Vol. 5, No.1 (Jan., 2010): 78-

90, http://rx9vh3hy4r.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=

info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_

fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Divine+Attributes&rft.jtitle=Philosophy+Compass&rft.au=Everitt%2C+Nicholas&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishers+Ltd&rft.issn=1747-9991&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=

1&rft.spage=78&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1747-9991.2009.00264.x&rft.external

DBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=215882260 (accessed October 5, 2012).

Falwell, Jerry, ed., Liberty Bible Commentary. Lynchburg, VA: The Old-Time Gospel Hour,

1982.

Frame, John M. The Doctrine of God: A Theology of Lordship. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R

Publishing, 2002.

Froese, Paul and Christopher Bader. 2010. America's Four Gods: What We Say About God &

What That Says About Us. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2010. Kindle Electronic Edition

Gurbikian, Gregory. The Deity of Jesus Christ in the Old and New Testaments. United States of

America: Xulonpress, 2011.

Hindson, Ed & Ergun Caner, eds., The Popular Encyclopedia of Apologetics: Surveying the

Evidence for the Truth of Christianity. Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 2008.

Hodge, Archibald Alexander. Outlines of Theology. London, UK: Paternoster Row, 1886.

Hodge, Charles. Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House Company, 1988.

La Croix, Richard R. “Aquinas on God's Omnipresence and Timelessness.”

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 42, No. 3 (Mar. 1982): 391-399, http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.liberty.edu:2048/stable/2107495?seq=1 (accessed October 12, 2012).

Mitchell, Daniel. “Why God?,” Liberty.edu. http://bb7.liberty.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?

tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1861793_ (accessed October 13, 2012).

Shedd, William GT. Shedd’s Dogmatic Theology. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers,

1980.

Tozer, A.W. The Knowledge of the Holy. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, 1961.

Van den Brink, Gijsbert & Marcel Sarot. “Understanding the Attributes of God.” Review

by: Donald Wayne Viney. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion , Vol. 48, No. 2 (Oct., 2000): 123-125, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40036442 (accessed October 1, 2012).

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. Nothing Greater Nothing Better: Theological Essays on the Love of God.

Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, Co, 2001.

Webster, Merriam. “Merriam-Webster.com. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/

attributes.

Wierenga, Edward R. “The Nature of God: An Inquiry into Divine Attributes.” Review by:

Thomas V. Morris. Noûs, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Sep., 1993): pp. 391-395, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2215944 (accessed October 11, 2012).

Williams, Robert R. "The ethical immutability of God." Journal of the American Academy of

Religion, Vol. 54, No. 4 (Dec., 1986): 721-738. http://rx9vh3hy4r.search.serialssolutions.

com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/

summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LA.+DORNER%3A+THE+ETHICAL+IMMUTABILITY+OF+GOD&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Academy+of+Religion&rft.au=WILLIAMS%2C+ROBERT+R&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.issn=0002-7189&rft.volume=LIV&rft.issue=

4&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fjaarel%2FLIV.4.721&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1093_jaarel_LIV_4_721 (accessed October 11, 2012).

Walvoord, John F. Jesus Christ Our Lord. Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1969.